|
|
Protestants and Sola Scriptura
Scripture, our Evangelical friends tell us, is the
inerrant Word of God. Quite right, the Catholic replies; but
how do you know this to be true?
It's not an easy question for Protestants, because,
having jettisoned Tradition and the Church, they have no
objective authority for the claims they make for Scripture.
There is no list of canonical books anywhere in the Bible, nor
does any book (with the exception of St. John's Apocalypse)
claim to be inspired. So, how does a "Bible Christian" know
the Bible is the Word of God?
If he wants to avoid a train of thought that will lead
him into the Catholic Church, he has just one way of
responding: With circular arguments pointing to himself (or
Luther or the Jimmy Swaggart Ministries or some other party
not mentioned in the Bible) as an infallible authority telling
him that it is so. Such arguments would have perplexed a
first or second century Christian, most of whom never saw a
Bible.
Christ founded a teaching Church. So far as we know, he
himself never wrote a word (except on sand). Nor did he
commission the Apostles to write anything. In due course,
some Apostles (and non-Apostles) composed the twenty-seven
books which comprise the New Testament. Most of these
documents are ad hoc; they are addressed to specific problems
that arose in the early Church, and none claim to present the
whole of Christian revelation. It's doubtful that St. Paul
even suspected that his short letter to Philemon begging
pardon for a renegade slave would some day be read as Holy
Scripture.
Who, then, decided that it was Scripture? The Catholic
Church. And it took several centuries to do so. It was not
until the Council of Carthage (397) and a subsequent decree by
Pope Innocent I that Christendom had a fixed New Testament
canon. Prior to that date, scores of spurious gospels and
"apostolic" writings were floating around the Mediterranean
basin: the Gospel of Thomas, the "Shepherd" of Hermas, St.
Paul's Letter to the Laodiceans, and so forth. Moreover, some
texts later judged to be inspired, such as the Letter to the
Hebrews, were controverted. It was the Magisterium, guided by
the Holy Spirit, which separated the wheat from the chaff.
But, according to Protestants, the Catholic Church was
corrupt and idolatrous by the fourth century and so had lost
whatever authority it originally had. On what basis, then, do
they accept the canon of the New Testament? Luther and Calvin
were both fuzzy on the subject. Luther dropped seven books
from the Old Testament, the so-called Apocrypha in the
Protestant Bible; his pretext for doing so was that orthodox
Jews had done it at the synod of Jamnia around 100 A. D.; but
that synod was explicitly anti-Christian, and so its decisions
about Scripture make an odd benchmark for Christians.
Luther's real motive was to get rid of Second Maccabees,
which teaches the doctrine of Purgatory. He also wanted to
drop the Letter of James, which he called "an epistle of
straw," because it flatly contradicts the idea of salvation by
"faith alone" apart from good works. He was restrained by
more cautious Reformers. Instead, he mistranslated numerous
New Testament passages, most notoriously Romans 3:28, to
buttress his polemical position.
The Protestant teaching that the Bible is the sole
spiritual authority--sola scriptura --is nowhere to be found in
the Bible. St. Paul wrote to Timothy that Scripture is
"useful" (which is an understatemtn), but neither he nor
anyone else in the early Church taught sola scriptura. And,
in fact, nobody believed it until the Reformation. Newman
called the idea that God would let fifteen hundred years pass
before revealing that the bible was the sole teaching
authority for Christians an "intolerable paradox."
Newman also wrote: "It is antecedently unreasonable to
Bsuppose that a book so complex, so unsystematic, in parts so
obscure, the outcome of so many minds, times, and places,
should be given us from above without the safeguard of some
authority; as if it could possibly, from the nature of the
case, interpret itself...." And, indeed, once they had set
aside the teaching authority of the Church, the Reformers
began to argue about key Scriptural passages. Luther and
Zwingli, for example, disagreed vehemently about what Christ
meant by the words, "This is my Body."
St. Augustine, usually Luther's guide and mentor, ought
to have the last word about sola scriptura: "But for the
authority of the Church, I would not believe the
Gospel."
George Sim Johnston
|