home | about Catholic.net | Ask an Expert | Daily Meditations | Apologetics | Catholic Singles | Find a Mass | Free Newsletter | 
catholic.net  
englishespañol shopping mallsupport a cause book storenewspapers magazine racktravel vocationschurch documents
channels
Good News
Inspiring Stories
Global Catholic News
Rome’s Zenit News
US Catholic News
Powered by NCRegister.com
Holy Father
Pope Bendict XVI
Pro-Life
Umbert the Unborn
Faith & Finances
Our Sacred Obligation
Mariology
About Our Lady
Parenting
Parenting God's Way
Faith
Faith and Morals
Mass Media
Media Watch
Spiritual Living
Daily Devotional
Living Church
Liturgy and History
Mother Teresa
A Tribute
Vocations
Following Christ
In Love for Life
Marriage & Sexuality
TwentySomething
For Young Adults
Church Teaching
Apologetics
Christmas Songs
Joy for the World
Catechism
CCC
go!
 
 
 

The substantive teachings are those of the head:
the symbolic beliefs
are those of the heart — the emotional ones.

Substance and symbols
By Frederick Heuser

The teachings of the Church are both substantive and symbolic. The substantive teachings are those that are of the head: the intellectual ones. The symbolic beliefs are those of the heart: the emotional ones. While we may never tamper with those that are substantive, the teachings handed down to us by Christ through his Church, we can, and sometimes do tamper with those things that are symbolic, peripheral if you will. We have done that since the Second Vatican Council. We have affirmed the dogmas, the core teachings but have changed the symbolic, the teachings of the heart. I propose that this was a grave mistake.

What are some of the obvious changes in religious practices in the post conciliar age? Sunday Mass attendance is critically diminished, some say it is now as low as 25% of American Catholics. The regular reception of the sacrament of Penance is the exception rather than the rule among the majority of Catholics. Couples living together without being married are on the increase as is illegitimacy, while birthrates among married people are at an all time low. Homosexuality has not only increased dramatically but is demanding to be accepted as a legitimate alternate lifestyle. Yet the teachings of the Church that treat of these things have not changed. People have changed, however, and I propose the reason for this is that they perceive that the Church has been changing. Perhaps this is because people are less concerned with what is substantive and more concerned with what is symbolic, that which speaks to the heart. A pre-conciliar wag once said that the average Catholic would be less upset to be told there were now four persons in the Blessed Trinity, than if it were now permitted to eat meat on Fridays.

What are some of the symbolic and peripheral changes that have greatly affected and confused the average Catholic? I propose the following as an incomplete list:

  • An entirely new Mass in the vernacular and facing the people
  • The sacraments in the vernacular with a different form than before
  • Lay people being allowed to touch the Sacred Host and sacred vessels
  • The diminution of the Eucharistic fast
  • Receiving Holy Communion under both species as Protestants do
  • Receiving Holy Communion standing instead of kneeling
  • Removal of the Communion rail
  • Proliferation of lay people in the sanctuary and ministers of Holy Communion
  • Allowing girls and women to be altar servers
  • The practical elimination of Friday abstinence and the Lenten fast
  • Wholesale abandonment of the priesthood and sisterhood
  • Discarding of religious garb by priests and sisters
  • Demise of lay societies: Christian Mothers, Holy Name, CYO, Sodalities, etc.
  • Loss of effectiveness of the Legion of Decency
  • Neglect of the Rosary and devotions to the Blessed Virgin Mary
  • Diminution of Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament and Corpus Christi Processions
  • Lack of insistence on children attending Catholic schools
  • Allowing Catholic weddings in Protestant churches
  • Wholesale annulments of marriages smacks of divorce Catholic style
  • Lack of respect for Bishops: many allow priests to confirm; we no longer kiss their rings; NCCB makes them seem more like politicians than shepherds
  • Dropping ember days, rogation days and vigils of great feastdays
  • Complete revision of the Church calendar that changed dates of feastdays that had been stable for centuries to other dates for no apparent reason. A case in point: our seminary’s patron is St. Francis de Sales. Since the seminary’s founding in 1845, his feast was celebrated on January 29th. On that day the alumni came back for a solemn Mass, a festive meal and priestly camaraderie. Then for no apparent reason his feastday was moved to January 24th. Why? It was a custom among many cultures to name their children after the saint on whose feastday they were born. That was changed causing sadness among many people. Why?
While none of these things are bad in themselves, they are great changes from customs and practices that reach back hundreds of years. If these changes are allowed by the Church then why not other changes? If Father can leave the priesthood and marry with the blessings of the Church, why can’t I leave my husband and marry someone else? If anyone can touch the Sacred Host, even a seven-year-old, and lay people can distribute Communion and do the readings at Mass, what is so special about the priesthood? If priests can confer the sacrament of Confirmation, what is so special about bishops? If deacons can be married and have families, why can’t priests? If women can do the readings at Mass and give out Holy Communion, why can’t they be ordained priests?

Now while it is easy for someone trained in theology and canon law to distinguish between things of substance and things of symbolism, the average person does not care about those distinctions. Ours is not a religion of the mind alone. We are not Quakers or Fundamentalists. The Catholic religion has always spoken to the heart as well as the mind. That is why our churches have traditionally had statues, stained glass windows, vigil lights, vestments, incense, bells, communion rails, etc. When these things are removed or changed, then to many so has the Church changed. It has become a different church, one in which they no longer feel comfortable or at home. To put it graphically, a man from the Southern part of Europe might not go to Mass very often, but if you make an insulting remark about the Blessed Virgin be prepared for a broken nose.

What then is the answer? Shall we restore all these things? Will that solve the problem? Or is it too late to do that? Some people say we cannot turn back the clock; but we do that each fall when we end daylight savings time. What should be changed, what should be retained and what should be modified?

We should follow the rubrics of the Novus Ordo which assumes the priest is facing the tabernacle, also called “ad orientem.” The rubrics assume this by requiring the priest to turn toward the people each time he has a dialogue with the people such as “The Lord be with you.” Those who say he has his back to the people should reflect on a bus driver and his passengers or baseball pitcher and his team. Neither the driver nor the pitcher has his back to anyone; rather they are all facing the same direction. Holy Communion should be received kneeling, preferably at a restored Communion rail. The option of receiving Holy Communion in the hand which, unfortunately, has become the norm, should be dropped and Communion should be received on the tongue as it has been for countless centuries. The Mass should be an exact translation from the Latin not the transliteration we have today.

The Eucharistic fast should be restored to three hours before receiving. The form of the sacraments should be restored to what it was before in an accurate translation. The ancient custom of allowing only boys and men to be altar servers should be restored. The ministries of lector and extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion should be restricted to adults who are exemplary Catholics. Holy Communion under both species should be restricted to very special occasions lest people think, as many do today, that they only receive part of Christ when they receive the Sacred Host alone.

Eucharistic devotions like Forty Hours Devotion and Corpus Christi processions should be mandated for each parish as it was in the past. Frequent Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament and Marian devotions should be strongly encouraged especially during the months of October and May.

Canon Law should be followed in insisting that priests and religious wear their appropriate garb (canon 669) and the Friday abstinence is required (canon 1251). We should also restore the penitential nature of Lent by requiring adults to fast each weekday. The fast should begin at age 21 as it did in the past. Eighteen-year-olds are still growing and need more nourishment.

Marriages should be witnessed only by priests or deacons, never by a Protestant minister. How many of us have had people complain, “My brother was married in a Protestant church and the Church doesn’t recognize his marriage; my neighbor was married in the same church and the Church says he is validly married; what is going on?” It will be difficult, admittedly, but we have to give people a better guide to movies than the secular ratings. Those ratings are almost useless. When the movie “The Graduate” came out many years ago it was rated “X” the equivalent of “N-17.” Today that same movie is rated “PG.” There still is a Catholic movie rating list but it is unavailable to most Catholics. When the entire parish stood and took the Legion of Decency Pledge on the First Sunday of Advent it was not only a powerful witness to decency but gave parents a tool to guide their children’s movie viewing.

One of the most bizarre moves by some bishops is to remove the obligation of Mass attendance on certain holydays, namely the Assumption, All Saints and the Solemnity of Mary the Mother of God, if they fall on Mondays or Saturdays. The rationale is that it would be too hard on a priest to offer so many Masses on consecutive days. I don’t know of any priest who was consulted or complained about this. What it does, in effect, is to say to the Faithful that if you miss Mass on a holyday through your own fault you commit a mortal sin and could go to hell. However, if the holyday falls on a Monday or Saturday, then you can miss it with a clear conscience and go to heaven. Let’s stop this silliness and keep our holydays holy.

The latest casualty in some dioceses is the feast of the Ascension. It has been decided by some bishops that Jesus didn’t ascend to heaven on Ascension Thursday as the Sacred Scripture says but that he returned to heaven on the seventh Sunday after Easter. In other words Ascension Thursday has become Ascension Sunday. So again the Faithful are, in effect, told that if you missed Mass on Ascension Thursday last year through your own fault you committed a mortal sin. However, this year you can skip Mass because Ascension Thursday no longer exists. What is this saying to the Faithful about the importance of Our Lord’s Ascension and the inerrancy of Sacred Scripture which says he ascended on a Thursday? Let’s leave well enough alone. The old adage applies: “If it isn’t broke, don’t fix it.”

Finally two unrelated subjects: Our bishops should gather for their meetings at a seminary or Catholic University not at a plush hotel and the meetings should be private and not televised. We should make our Catholic grade and high schools affordable so all of our children could attend them. They have become too expensive. Perhaps new orders of Sisters or using more retired or single teachers who could work for a smaller salary. Lutheran and Jewish schools are proliferating while many of ours are closing. Perhaps we can learn from them.

We have unintentionally forgotten the symbolic in the practice of our Faith, the things of the heart, and we must restore it. I propose that the few suggestions I have made may be a beginning. Something must be done to convince our people that the Church has not changed, that the real heartfelt practices of our Faith are still in place because we have restored them. We must assure the Faithful that Catholicism provides spiritual nourishment for the whole person, his heart as well as his mind.


Reverend Frederick Heuser is the pastor of St. James Parish in Kenosha, Wis. He has a B.A. in philosophy and an M.Div. from St. Francis Seminary in Milwaukee and an M.A. in speech from Marquette University. After ordination, he taught in a high school, and then became the Associate Director of the Catholic Family Life Program of Milwaukee before assuming his present position. His last article in HPR appeared in April 1998.

Back to Homiletic & Pastoral Review Table of Contents December 2000

Back to Catholic Information Center Main Periodical Page