home | about Catholic.net | Ask an Expert | Daily Meditations | Apologetics | Catholic Singles | Find a Mass | Free Newsletter | 
catholic.net  
englishespañol shopping mallsupport a cause book storenewspapers magazine racktravel vocationschurch documents
channels
Good News
Inspiring Stories
Global Catholic News
Rome’s Zenit News
US Catholic News
Powered by NCRegister.com
Holy Father
Pope Bendict XVI
Pro-Life
Umbert the Unborn
Faith & Finances
Our Sacred Obligation
Mariology
About Our Lady
Parenting
Parenting God's Way
Faith
Faith and Morals
Mass Media
Media Watch
Spiritual Living
Daily Devotional
Living Church
Liturgy and History
Mother Teresa
A Tribute
Vocations
Following Christ
In Love for Life
Marriage & Sexuality
TwentySomething
For Young Adults
Church Teaching
Apologetics
Christmas Songs
Joy for the World
Catechism
CCC
go!
 
 
 
APOLOGETICS

From Memory to Reconciliation
Part 2: Resolution and Reconciliation

by Martin K. Barrack
Holy Mother Church’s appeal for purification of memory is part of the larger Jubilee movement toward solidarity between Jews and Catholics. This article, addressed to Catholics who dialogue with Jews, explores some practical steps along our pilgrim journey from memory to reconciliation. It concludes that the accelerating pace of salvation history may leave open the present window of opportunity for only a short time.

The first part presented the Church’s relationship with the Jewish people and some current obstacles. This second part offers some ways to overcome the obstacles.


The Historic Crossroads
Opportunity

As the millennium approaches, Jews and Catholics have a historic opportunity to come together as brothers in God’s providence. There can be no turning back to the ghetto in which Judaism survived for so many centuries. The ghetto can never again be the cloister it was. Modern satellite technology means that hundreds of television channels can be received anywhere. Even the Jew who lives in a small apartment with no satellite dish has access to the Internet.

God said, “I have set before you this day life and good, death and evil” (Dt 30:15). The way to life is t’shuvah,1 resolute reversal of the past half-century’s transition from reliance on God to reliance on government, toward re-instituting the Ten Commandments as the moral star of western civilization. We have fallen far into the miry bog, but our heavenly Father can deliver us as He did King David. “I waited patiently for the Lord; he inclined to me and heard my cry. He drew me up from the desolate pit, out of the miry bog, and set my feet upon a rock” (Ps 40:1).

Jews and Catholics need to choose religious life, supporting one another as friends and allies. A recent movement in the United Nations gathered considerable momentum to change the status of the Vatican, in international law a sovereign nation, on the ground that “it’s a religion not a country.” The Vatican is an independent nation, a 109-acre enclave in Rome on the west bank of the Tiber River, with its own flag, telephone system, post office, radio station, banking system and Swiss Guards, with special extraterritorial privileges in ten other buildings within Rome as well as Castel Gandolfo, the Pope’s summer residence in the Alban Hills, and embassies in numerous foreign nations. The Vatican has engaged in international relations since the fourth century and currently exchanges diplomats with nearly 170 countries everywhere in the world. Within its territory the Pope has absolute legislative, executive and judicial power. From 756 to 1870 the papal states covered much of central Italy. By 1929 the Lateran Treaty provided that the Vatican would recognize the state of Italy with Rome as its capital while Italy in return would recognize papal sovereignty over Vatican City. Most Vatican City residents are priests and nuns, although there are also several hundred laymen in the secretarial, domestic, trade, and service occupations.

At present, the Vatican has a special status as a Non-Member State Permanent Observer (NMSPO). Switzerland has the same status, for a similar reason. The Vatican speaks of principles rather than persons because it seeks to remain neutral so that it can serve all nations. NMSPO status enables the Vatican and Switzerland to participate in discussions while preserving political neutrality. NMSPO countries also have no obligation to send soldiers to participate in “peacekeeping” missions which often in practice become military engagements. The campaign seeks to reduce the Vatican’s status to Non-Government Observer (NGO), which can be one person with a fax machine.

Some Jews are already supporting the Holy See. Rabbi Yehuda Levin comments:

    Half a century ago, my family was the victim of a movement which wanted to rid the world of Jews and Jewish teachings and Jewish values. Today the extremists seek to disallow and disenfranchise the Catholic community and their ideas. Often it is the Catholic presence which reflects our traditional Jewish teaching on respect for life and family. I call upon the UN and her members to reject this censorship, reject the bigotry, and reject this hate of the Vatican and of the Jewish pro-life and family [traditions] it expresses. Sixty years ago our people asked, “Where were you for the Jews?” Today we ask the world, “Where are you for the Catholics?”2
Rabbi Levin’s remarks remind us of Lutheran pastor Martin Niemoller, imprisoned by the Nazis near Berlin, who said:
    In Germany, they first came for the communists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn’t speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up.
The Vatican and Israel are not the only states in the United Nations with a special religious identity. The U.S. State Department’s Annual Report on International Religious Freedom for 19993 states of Saudi Arabia:
    Freedom of Religion does not exist. Islam is the official religion, and all citizens must be Muslims. The Government prohibits the public practice of other religions. Private worship by non-Muslims is permitted.

    The Government has declared the Islamic holy book the Koran, and the Sunna (tradition) of the Prophet Muhammad, to be the country’s Constitution. The Government bases its legitimacy on governance according to the precepts of a rigorously conservative form of Islam. Neither the Government nor society in general accepts the concept of separation of religion and state.

    Conversion by a Muslim to another religion is considered apostasy. Public apostasy is a crime under Shari’a (Islamic law) and punishable by death.

During the 1991 Gulf War, U.S. military chaplains in Saudi Arabia were required to remove the crosses from their uniforms!

The State Department report says of Afghanistan: “Freedom of religion is restricted severely. Due to the absence of a constitution and the ongoing civil war, religious freedom is determined primarily by unofficial, unwritten, and evolving policies of the warring factions. In most parts of the country, the Pashtun-dominated ultra-conservative Islamic movement known as the Taliban vigorously enforced its interpretation of Islamic law.” It says of Iran: “The Government restricts freedom of religion. The Constitution declares that the ‘official religion of Iran is Islam and the doctrine followed is that of Ja’fari (Twelver) Shi’ism.’” Of Iraq: “The Constitution provides for freedom of religion; however, the Government severely limits this right in practice. Islam is the official state religion. The Government’s registration requirements for religious organizations are unknown. The Ministry of Endowments and Religious Affairs monitors places of worship, appoints the clergy, approves the building and repair of all places of worship, and approves the publication of all religious literature.” Of Sudan: “The Government treats Islam as the state religion and has declared that Islam must inspire the country’s laws, institutions, and policies.”

The other Islamic Conference states, Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Benin, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Gabon, The Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen, exercise varying levels of control over religious activity.

Some non-Islamic countries are also hostile to religious freedom. The State Department report treats China with remarkable deference but admits, “Police closed many ‘underground’ mosques, temples, seminaries, Catholic churches, and Protestant ‘house churches,’ many with significant memberships, properties, financial resources, and networks. Leaders of unauthorized groups are often the targets of harassment, interrogations, detention, and physical abuse.”

Even England has an official religion. The King or Queen of England holds the title “Defender of the Faith of the Church of England.” The Act of Settlement of 1701 to this day prohibits any person in the direct line of succession to the throne from marrying a Roman Catholic. So the attempt to remove the Vatican from full United Nations membership is not because “it’s a religion” but because it proposes the Catholic religion.

Israel too has suffered exclusion as a nation associated with a particular religion. In the United Nations, Israel is the only member nation that cannot sit on the Security Council. It is also the only nation that belongs to no regional grouping; the Europeans, Asians, and Africans will not accept it as a partner.

The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, parent body of the American Red Cross, has 176 member organizations from every part of the world, including North Korea, Afghanistan, and Iraq. But Israel’s Red Cross, the Mogen David Adom, is denied admission and relegated to observer status, ostensibly because its Red Shield (Star) of David would lead to a proliferation of other symbols. Islamic countries were allowed to use the Red Crescent and even to make it part of the Federation’s name. Iran was allowed to use its Lion and Sun. The Arab countries simply do not want Israel to be a full member. We need each other as brothers in God’s providence.

Ecumenism
Vatican II teaches that all Catholics are called to ecumenism:

    The restoration of unity among all Christians is one of the principal concerns of the Second Vatican Council . . . But the Lord of Ages wisely and patiently follows out the plan of grace on our behalf, sinners that we are. In recent times more than ever before, He has been rousing divided Christians to remorse over their divisions and to a longing for unity . . . This movement toward unity is called “ecumenical.”4
Ecumenism is coming together for combined strength on principles held in common by each faith. For instance, Jews and Catholics together proclaim, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord” (Dt 6:4). Jews, Catholics, Protestants, and Muslims may come together as brothers in Abrahamic faith to oppose the Mormon idea of many gods.

Jewish and Catholic teaching are both authentic revelations from God at different stages of salvation history, so they overlay one another exceptionally well. Identifying elements common to both faith traditions helps them to love one another.

However, both Jewish and Catholic authorities are determined to avoid syncretism, which takes some from this religion and some from that. If Jews say God is one divine person while Catholics say three, syncretism might propose two. Syncretism will be rigorously excluded.

The Church recognizes that ecumenism entails the risk that it will be unrequited or even ridiculed.

    With respect to ecumenism, the purpose of ecclesial acts of repentance can be none other than the unity desired by the Lord. Therefore, it is hoped that they will be carried out reciprocally, though at times prophetic gestures may call for a unilateral and absolutely gratuitous initiative.5
From both faith and long experience, the Church knows that her Shepherd will lead His flock to safe pasture. “If the world hates you, know that it has hated me before it hated you” (Jn 15:18). He added, “In the world you have tribulation; but be of good cheer, I have overcome the world” (Jn 16:33).

Approach
Memory and Reconciliation recognizes some of the difficulties.

    In the dialogue with cultures, one must, above all, keep in mind the complexity and plurality of the notions of repentance and forgiveness in the minds of those with whom we dialogue. In every case, the Church’s taking responsibility for past faults should be explained in the light of the Gospel and of the presentation of the crucified Lord, who is the revelation of mercy and the source of forgiveness, in addition to explaining the nature of ecclesial communion as a unity through time and space.6
Judaism is both a religious faith and a people with a distinctive culture. At the religious level, for starting the dialogue it should suffice to invoke God’s command that we love one another (Lv 19:18) and that Jesus summarized the Decalogue in His two great commandments. The first three Decalogue commandments teach us how to love God while the remaining seven teach us how to love one another.7 Our crucified Lord prayed in His agony, “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do” (Lk 23:34).

However, at the cultural level the situation is more complicated. Judaism does not have a counterpart to the Vicar of Christ, one man who can lead the whole people of faith. Some, such as Rabbi Neusner8 and Rabbi Klenicki,9 have been receptive. Others have been less so. Memory and Reconciliation proposes for cases of deliberate obstinacy:

    Where one may be dealing with a prejudicial indifference to the language of faith, one should take into account the possible double effect of an act of repentance by the Church: on the one hand, negative prejudices or disdainful and hostile attitudes might be confirmed; on the other hand, these acts share in the mysterious attraction exercised by the “crucified God.”10 One should also take into account the fact that in the current cultural context, above all of the West, the invitation to a purification of memory involves believers and non-believers alike in a common commitment. This common effort is itself already a positive witness of docility to the truth.11
St. Paul taught, “If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him drink; for by doing so you will heap burning coals upon his head” (Rom 12:20). Over time, a generous outpouring of true and consistent charity embarrasses and isolates those who obstinately withhold charity. Still, if even Jesus could win over only Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea among the Sanhedrin, all we can do is humbly open the way for the Holy Spirit to reach our brothers’ hearts.

What Catholics Can Offer Jews
Worldwide, there are about 100 Christians for every Jew. When it is proposed that Jews work together with Christians for common social and political objectives, the Jewish side often anticipates that its interests would be submerged. In fact, Jewish legal acumen alone would assure the continued survival and success of Jewish objectives in the United States and Israel, the countries in which a majority of the world’s Jews live.

But it would not merely be survival by wits. Christian social principles, rightly understood, support the right of Jews to live as Jews. Since Protestant Christianity, beyond a few well-known principles, does not have a coherent social philosophy, we may turn to Catholic social teaching for a vision of Christian statecraft.

Catholic social teaching is proclaimed primarily through letters from the pope that apply the eternal principles to a changing world. They are called “encyclical” letters, from the Latin encyclicus, circular, because they are intended for wide circulation. Pope Leo XIII set forth five great principles of Catholic social teaching in his encyclical Rerum Novarum (1891):

  1. God is sovereign over man.
  2. Each human person has incomparable worth and dignity consistent with being made in God’s image and likeness.
  3. The family, not the individual, is the basic unit of society.
  4. Every human being has a right to economic initiative.
  5. Every human being has a right to own property. Pope Paul VI’s Populorum Progressio (1967), and Pope John Paul II’s Laborem Exercens (1981), Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (1987) and Centesimus Annus (1991) further develop these principles of Catholic social teaching.

God is Sovereign
The first great precept of Catholic social teaching is God’s sovereignty over man. From that flows the truth that our soul, pure spirit in God’s image and likeness (Gn 1:27) needs God. Leo XIII said that the “religious interests of the worker [must] receive proper consideration.”12 He explained that the just wage was not the lowest an employer could get away with, but “sufficiently large to enable [the laborer] to provide comfortably for himself, his wife, and his children.”13 God created marriage and the family for procreation, to participate in God’s ongoing creation by producing healthy children who would grow up and themselves marry and procreate. Pope John Paul II observed that far too many people still “live in situations in which the struggle for the bare minimum is uppermost.”14 Leo XIII affirmed the right of workers to form associations, provided that “moral and religious perfection ought to be regarded as their principal goal,” and added, “What would it profit a worker to secure through an association an abundance of goods, if his soul through lack of an abundance of its proper food should run the risk of perishing.”15 Jesus asked rhetorically, “For what does it profit a man, to gain the whole world and forfeit his [eternal] life?” (Mk 8:36). John Paul II expressed it succinctly: “The apex of development is the exercise of the right and duty to seek God, to know Him and to live in accordance with that knowledge.”16

God’s Image and Likeness
The second great precept is the incomparable worth and dignity of every human being consistent with being made in God’s image and likeness. Leo XIII affirmed that “. . . no one may with impunity outrage the great dignity of man, which God Himself treats with great reverence . . . a man may not even by his own free choice allow himself to be treated in a way inconsistent with his nature.”17 The Church further teaches, “Respect for the human person entails respect for the rights that flow from his dignity as a creature. These rights are prior to society and must be recognized by it. They are the basis for the moral legitimacy of every authority.”18

The Church does not impose its will on government. John Paul II wrote, “Nor does the Church close her eyes to the danger of fanaticism or fundamentalism among those who, in the name of an ideology which purports to be scientific or religious, claim the right to impose on others their own concept of what is true and good.”19 He added that the Church “is not entitled to express preferences for this or that institutional or constitutional solution.”20 Rather, the Church’s “contribution to the political order is precisely her vision of the dignity of the person revealed in all its fullness in the mystery of the Incarnate Word.”21 John Paul II, addressing missionary activity, added, “The Church proposes; she imposes nothing.”22

We Are Called to Help the Poor
The third great precept is that every human being has a right to economic initiative. John Paul II wrote, “The right to economic initiative is a right which is important not only for the individual but for the common good. Experience shows us that the denial of this right . . . destroys the spirit of initiative . . . This provokes a sense of frustration, of desperation, and predisposes people to opt out of national life.”23 The Church teaches, “These differences [among men] belong to God’s plan, who wills that each receive what he needs from others, and that those endowed with particular talents share the benefits with those who need them. These differences encourage and often oblige persons to practice generosity, kindness, and sharing of goods.”24 The Church teaches that we are certainly to help those in need. “By virtue of her own evangelical duty the Church feels called to take her stand beside the poor, to discern the justice of their requests, and to help satisfy them, without losing sight of the . . . context of the common good.”25 We learn to love one another, and receive blessings from God for it, when we freely give our own resources to the poor. State redistribution, whether by collectivism, confiscatory taxation or allocation by race or ethnicity, forcibly takes from us the resources we might have offered charitably to others and often leaves us resenting the very persons that the Church ardently desires we love.

Love for the poor means that we actively want the poor to discover God’s love and grace, and also to have adequate food, clothing and shelter, and that we freely do what we can to help. The usual objection is that the total volume of gifts freely given would not be enough to cover the cost of sustaining the poor. From a Catholic perspective that is evidence that we all — Catholics, Jews, Protestants, Muslims, etc. — have not proclaimed the great love to which God calls us, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself” (Lv 19:18). Jesus raised that love to embrace all mankind and made it the mark of His disciples: “Love one another; even as I have loved you, that you also love one another. By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another” (Jn 13:34). Even atheists often discover in the natural law an obligation to help the poor.

The Family is the Sanctuary of Life
The fourth great precept is that the family, not the individual, is the basic unit of society. The Church emphasizes that family means a man and woman wed in holy matrimony and raising children. John Paul II explained,

    The first and fundamental structure for “human ecology” is the family, in which someone receives his first formative ideas about truth and goodness, and learns what it means to love and to be loved, and thus what it actually means to be a person. Here we mean the family founded in marriage, in which the mutual gift of self by husband and wife creates an environment in which children can be born, develop their potentialities, become aware of their dignity and prepare to face their unique and individual destiny . . . It is necessary to go back to seeing the family as the sanctuary of life. The family is indeed sacred: it is the place in which life — the gift of God — can be properly welcomed and protected against the many attacks to which it is exposed, and can develop in accordance with what constitutes authentic human growth.26

Private Property Serves Human Freedom
The fifth great precept is the right to private property. Leo XIII wrote that the right to private property “. . . is inherent in natural law: “. . . it is the most sacred law of nature that the father of a family see that his offspring are provided with all the necessities of life.”27 John Paul II carefully explains that Catholic social teaching supports

    . . . an economic system which recognizes the fundamental and positive role of business, the market, private property, and the resulting responsibility for the means of production, as well as free human creativity in the economic sector . . . circumscribed within a strong juridical framework which places it at the service of human freedom in its totality, and which sees it as a particular aspect of that freedom, the core of which is ethical and religious.”28
Catholic insistence on absolute truth is precisely what would protect Jews in a land governed by Catholic principles. The Catholic Church holds as absolutely true that God gave us freedom to accept or reject God’s offered grace. Jews would have far more freedom to worship as Jews in a Catholic social environment than in an environment in which all public religious activity is suppressed. Memory and Reconciliation acknowledges that many Catholics have not understood Church teaching, and calls Catholics to walk toward the Cross on a path of love and charity for all.

Ethical relativism undergirds the secular liberal perspective. Increasing numbers of young people say, “I personally didn’t like the Shoah, but I can’t say that it was wrong.” There is not much safety for any of us in such a morally vacuous environment.

What Jews Can Offer Catholics
As Jews and Catholics walk together toward God, it is healthy for us to establish a principle of reciprocity.

Repentance
Memory and Reconciliation said, “It would also be desirable if these acts of repentance would stimulate the members of other religions to acknowledge the faults of their own past.”29 God loves all His covenant family; anti-Catholicism is the same sin as anti-Judaism. Comparable Jewish purification of memory might at minimum include some contrition for Rabbi Gamaliel’s Birkat ha Minim (Benediction of the Heretics), a 19th “benediction” added around 80 AD to the traditional Shemone Esre (Eighteen Benedictions) that sought to pray the Christians into hell as well as extremely scurrilous descriptions in Talmud of Jesus and Mary which have remained embedded in Jewish sacred tradition for 1,800 years. Jewish writings have consistently described Jesus and His Church, currently Pius XII, in scathing terms. Reconciliation can occur only if both sides confess their sins in true contrition and seek to know one another as brothers in God’s providence.

Civic Activity
The same principles for protection of religious and civic activity should apply to both Christians in Israel and Jews in the United States. Most Christians in Israel are Palestinian, as are most Muslims. There is a vast difference between Christians, whose religious doctrines expressly support freedom of worship, and Muslims, who characterize non-Muslims as “infidels,” bar them from the streets of Mecca and Medina, and might someday bar them from Jerusalem where stand together the Dome of the Rock, the Al-Aqsa Mosque, and the Wall. Palestinian Christians are often persecuted by Israel, which has generally restricted Palestinians without regard to the principle of freedom of worship, and by the Palestinian Authority, which discriminates against Christians because they support freedom of worship.

Canonized Saints
St. Maximilian Kolbe gave a stirring example by volunteering to be killed at Auschwitz in place of Polish army sergeant Francis Gajowniczek. Everyone who knew what that Catholic priest did saw in him a reflection of Jesus, who freely gave His own life on the cross for us. Yet some prominent Jews objected to his being canonized because they claimed that he was anti-Jewish. In fact, he wrote only occasionally on Jews or Judaism, and then his interest was in the conversion of Jews to Catholicism. Jesus calls every Catholic, “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations . . . teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you” (Mt 28:19).

St. Teresa Benedicta of the Cross30 was a cloistered nun who became a Catholic martyr at Auschwitz in 1942 by offering her life for the people of Israel. Many Jewish organizations objected to her canonization because she was the first Jewish-born saint since the apostles. The Jewish argument is that she was killed because she was a Jew and therefore could not be claimed as a Catholic martyr. St. Teresa Benedicta became Catholic at the moment of her baptism and was killed specifically as a Catholic of Jewish origin.

Pope Pius XII was hailed by prominent Jews in his day for heroic efforts to save Jewish lives in an extremely difficult environment. Rabbi Marvin Hier of the Simon Wiesenthal Center has been opposing his canonization as a Catholic saint, arguing that throughout World War II he “sat on the throne of St. Peter in stony silence, without ever lifting a finger, as each day thousands of Jews were sent to the gas chambers with his full knowledge.” Catholics who observe that a rabbi can press so bitter a calumny and still keep his job are apt to draw conclusions that will not help efforts to improve relations.

The decision as to who is a Catholic saint belongs to the Catholic Church. The dialogue between Jews and Catholics has great value, but when Jews extend the rubric of anti-Judaism to internal Catholic decisions they open the way for Catholics to raise comparable issues within Judaism.

Shoah
Jews correctly deplore the old “Jews killed Christ” blood libel, but many press a “Christianity begot the Shoah” blood libel. Moral clarity requires that the Nazi high command, whose orders built Auschwitz and whose orders could have dismantled it, be held solely responsible. The “continuity theory,” which disperses moral responsibility among a whole population, consistently applied, leads straight back to “the Jews killed Christ.”

Jews ask Catholics to respect Jewish suffering during the Shoah, but often decline to recognize that many Catholics and others died as well. The Nazis decimated the Catholic Church in Poland. In the Warthegau region the Nazis killed 80 percent of the Catholic clergy, in Wroclaw, 49.2 percent, in Chelmno, 47.8 percent; in Lodz, 36.8 percent; in Poznan, 31.1 percent. Poznan had 30 churches and 47 chapels; the Nazis left two open to serve 200,000 Catholics. In Lodz four churches were left open to serve 700,000 Catholics.31 In all, some three million Polish Catholics were killed.

Mishna Sanhedrin 4:5 teaches that whoever destroys one life is considered by Torah as if he destroyed the entire world, and that whoever saves one life is considered by Torah as if he saved an entire world. We all have dead to mourn.

You Will Try to Convert Us
Jews and Christians see evangelization from very different perspectives. Jesus called His followers to go and make disciples of all nations (Mt 28:19). From the Jewish perspective, an invigorated Christianity would draw even more Jews.

The best defense is a strong faith. Orthodox Jewish conversions to Christianity are rare because their Jewish roots are deep. The plant with weak roots is the one easily pulled from the soil. Beyond that, let us review the Catholic teaching in this area. “Nobody may be forced to act against his convictions, nor is anyone to be restrained from acting in accordance with his conscience in religious matters in private or in public, alone or in association with others, within due limits. This right is based on the very nature of the human person, whose dignity enables him freely to assent to the divine truth which transcends the temporal order.”32 Catholics will never again force baptism on Jews.

An invigorated Jewish faith and an invigorated Catholic Church will continue walking as brothers in God’s providence. Catholics will try to lead Jews into the Church, and Jews will try to resist, until the end of time. But when we zoom the lens back from telephoto to wide angle, we will find the brothers much more healthy and better prepared to resist the secular forces that threaten both their flocks.

The Time is Now
Maimonides believed that before the Messiah’s arrival all the world would be Jewish. The Catholic Church, Judaism transformed by the Messiah, understands that the Messiah’s return is suspended at every moment of history until His recognition by all Israel.33 This is the context of Memory and Reconciliation. Jeff Jacoby observed, “The Pope’s confession is a moral event of seismic proportions.”34 Sidney Zion wrote that the Pope’s “plea to God for forgiveness [is] as awesome in its way as the Holocaust itself.”35

God promised to join Ezekiel’s two sticks, “that they may be one in my hand” (Ez 37:19). The stick of Jacob is the tribes of Judah and Benjamin, the Jews of today. The stick of Joseph is the stick of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel. There has been a stirring of interest in the ten tribes. Although most descendants of the ten tribes assimilated into distant populations thousands of years ago, researchers have discovered throughout the world isolated communities practicing recognizably Jewish worship. Ezekiel’s prophecy continued, “My servant David shall be king over them; and they shall all have one shepherd” (Ez 37:24). The Son of David said, “There shall be one flock, one shepherd” (Jn 10:16).

Catholics recognize too that, “The Church will enter the glory of the kingdom only through this final Passover, when she will follow her Lord in his death and Resurrection.”36 The present confusion among so many bishops and priests in the United States, together with the federal government’s intense interest in being the nation’s moral tutor on issues such as life and death within the womb, relationships between the races, and homosexual behavior, while it actively seeks to suppress Christian influence in public life, suggests that we are in the final Passover today.

It has long been observed that, in a mysterious way, Jews across the centuries have reflected the image of Jesus. They have walked a long via crucis, beaten, mocked and derided. Mystically speaking, the Jews were crucified at Auschwitz and three years later rose from the dead in Israel after a three thousand year exile. The Jews as a people are taking on a Christlike character in their intense focus on the Shoah, their final sacrifice. Marc Chagall depicted that Christlike dimension in Exodus, White Crucifixion, and other paintings and lithographs.

This time in salvation history is so extraordinary, and is moving so rapidly, that our darkened intellects can scarcely comprehend it. To Jews who viscerally oppose any reconciliation with Christianity, we can only commend trust in God’s providence. To Catholics, we recall Christ’s explanation of the Holy Spirit, “The wind blows where it wills, and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know whence it comes or whither it goes” (Jn 3:8).

“I have put before you life and death, blessing and curse; therefore choose life, that you and your descendants may live” (Dt 30:19). This historic opportunity to come closer to God, and closer to one another, perfectly preserving the integrity of both faiths, may not last long. The Shoah and the sudden disappearance of Christianity from public life bring into sharp focus the need for all who serve our Father in heaven to work together against the culture of death. As both historic events recede into the sands of time, Jewish and Christian multitudes may come to see religion as less important in their lives, to their eternal loss. But if we can come together and love one another as God commanded, (Lev 19:18), our pilgrim journey on this long dark road will lead us to the superbrilliant light of His glory.

© Copyright Martin K Barrack, 2000. All rights reserved.


  1. Return, as in return of the prodigal son.
  2. Quoted by Mary Jo Anderson in “The Vatican on Trial at the United Nations,” Crisis Magazine, May 2000, p. 35
  3. U.S. Department of State, Bureau for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, September 9, 1999
  4. Unitatis Redintegratio (Decree on Ecumenism), 1964, Introduction
  5. Memory and Reconciliation, Section 6.3
  6. Memory and Reconciliation, Section 6.3
  7. As Jews count the Commandments, the first four teach us how to love God while the remaining six teach us how to love one another.
  8. Rabbi Jacob Neusner, A Rabbi Talks With Jesus (New York: Doubleday, 1993)
  9. Rabbi Leon Klenicki and Father Peter Stravinskas, A Catholic-Jewish Encounter (Huntington: Indiana, Our Sunday Visitor, 1994)
  10. M&R End Note #97: “This particular strong formulation comes from St. Augustine, De Trinitate I, 13, 28: CCL 50, 69,13; Epist. 169, 2: CSEL 44, 617; Sermo 341A, 1: Misc. Agost. 314, 22.”
  11. Memory and Reconciliation, Section 6.3
  12. Rerum Novarum, n. 31
  13. Rerum Novarum, n. 65
  14. Centesimus Annus, n. 33
  15. Rerum Novarum, n. 77
  16. Centesimus Annus, n. 29
  17. Rerum Novarum, n. 57
  18. Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 1930
  19. Centesimus Annus, n. 46
  20. Centesimus Annus, n. 47
  21. Centesimus Annus, n. 47
  22. Redemptoris Missio, n. 39
  23. Sollicitudo Rei Socialis, n. 15
  24. Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 1937
  25. Sollicitudo Rei Socialis, n. 39
  26. Centesimus Annus, n. 39
  27. Rerum Novarum, n. 20
  28. Centesimus Annus, n. 42
  29. Section 6.3
  30. Edith Stein. Born an Orthodox Jew, became an atheist at 14, wrote books on philosophy as part of a brilliant academic career, was baptized a Catholic at 29 and became a Carmelite nun in 1934, the year after Hitler took power.
  31. Statistics from Thomas J. Craughwell’s article “The Gentile Holocaust,” which appeared in Sursum Corda, Summer 1998, pp. 28-30 and 47-49
  32. Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 2106
  33. Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 674
  34. The Boston Globe, March 16, 2000
  35. The New York Daily News, March 14, 2000.
  36. Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 677. Rev. 19:1-9.

Marty Barrack, a Jewish convert and Catholic evangelist, is the author of Second Exodus, published by Magnificat Institute Press in Houston, Texas, which illuminates the Jewish heritage of the Catholic Church. The book is the centerpiece of Marty’s Second Exodus apostolate (http://www.secondexodus.com) which helps Catholics serve Jews interested in learning more about the Church.

Back to Catholic Faith March/April 2001 Table of Contents

Back to Catholic Information Center on Internet